Page 71 - Tallinn University

HARIDUSTEADUSED Tallinna Ülikooli üliõpilaste 2015/2016. õppeaasta PARIMAD TEADUSTÖÖD / Artiklite kogumik
realities of readers. Furthermore, the research con rms that journalists have framing intentions be- cause the realities of readers regarding the online articles overlap.
referenceS
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1981). e Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clari cation of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of
Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D.
Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reese, S. D. (2010). Finding Frames in a Web of Culture: e Case of the War on
Terror. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and eoretical
Perspectives (17-42). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group. Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World.
London: Earthscan.
Stocchetti, M., & Kukkonen, K. (2010). Critical Media Analysis: An Introduction for Media Professionals. Frankfurt: Peter Lang AG.
Van Dijk, J. (1999). e Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media. (L. Spoorenberg, Trans.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. (Original work published in 1991).
71